As the contradictory condom play with with relaxed couples was of the number out-of other intimate lovers (Matser ainsi que al
Manage parameters
Sociodemographic handle variables have been examined from the baseline: age, studies webpages, degree, a career standing, relationship position, and you can month-to-month money. , 2014), i and additionally managed to have number of couples in earlier times 6 days when carrying out analyses with these inconsistent condom use depending variable.
Processes
Most of the professionals provided told created consent to be involved in for each and every role of this research study. All the study steps and standards was indeed approved by the Institutional Opinion Chat rooms in the College or university off Illinois in the Chicago, the fresh new College out-of Vermont within Church Mountain, therefore the Instituto Dominicano de- Dermatologia y Cirugia de la Piel Dr. Heriberto Bogaert into the Santo Domingo, DR.
Analyses
We introduce detailed statistics each of your sociodemographic variables, GRC/S scale, and you will mainly based details. For each of one’s around three established variables, we presented bivariate logistic regression towards the standard GRC/S get given that independent adjustable. I report unadjusted possibility ratios (OR) and you will 95% count on durations for these bivariate analyses. Then, i presented multivariate logistic regression each established changeable which have standardized GRC/S score together with full band of control. For those analyses, i declaration modified chance rates (AOR) and 95% count on durations (CI). Most of the analyses reported lower than were used when you look at the SAS variation 9.4.
Overall performance
Demographic qualities are provided inside the Dining table step one . Very guys was in period of 31 (median: 26; range: 18-41) and you may a big part (69%) got at the very least a highschool studies. Seventy-around three % of men was in fact working (both authoritative otherwise relaxed labor industry), 11% was unemployed, and you can 16% was in fact pupils. Merely 8% generated over 25,100 Dominican Pesos (DOP) in earlier times week, regarding the 625 U.S. bucks (USD). Nineteen per cent gained less than a lot of DOP (25 USD) plus the other countries in the people (72%) acquired between one thousand DOP and you may 25,100000 DOP. Half of new boys stated are single but got somebody, 14% had been married, and thirty five% was single with no typical spouse.
We measured around three sexual risk behaviors ( Desk 1 ). Thirty-one percent of men advertised which have two or more people within going back 1 month. Of males that advertised with a non-regular partner in past 6 months (letter = 194), 43% claimed inconsistent condom fool around with which have non-steady lovers in earlier times half a year. Whenever people stated towards the history date they had sex, 21% asserted that they were drinking alcohol.
Just before standardizing, brand new GRC/S level got a hateful from 18.2 (range: 3–34) and a beneficial SD of five.eight ( Desk 2 ). Select Dining table 2 for all measure circumstances.
Whenever evaluation the latest bivariate relationships between each sexual exposure conclusion and men’s GRC/S results, i receive relationships in the asked direction ( Dining table step 3 ). Specifically, males who’d increased GRC/S score had high probability of revealing for each sexual decisions. A couple of sexual habits–having 2 or more couples before thirty day period, and alcohol consumption for once intercourse – have been rather associated with having an increased GRC/S. New bivariate relationships between inconsistent use of condoms with low-regular lovers and you may GRC/S wasn’t tall.
Shortly after dealing with to possess sociodemographic services ( Desk step 3 ), large GRC/S try significantly associated with the improved probability of having two otherwise much more lovers previously thirty day period (AOR: 1.33, 95% confidence period [CI]: step 1.0step one-step 1.74), contradictory condom fool around with having non-steady couples (AOR: step one.45, 95% CI: step 1.04-dos.01), and you may having a drink at last sex (AOR: step wing Г§evrimiГ§i 1.56, 95% CI: 1.13-dos.17).
Discussion
The analysis provided support to the connection ranging from GRC/S and men’s intimate exposure behaviors, as well as number of sexual partners, inconsistent condom explore having non-regular couples, and drinking alcohol for a change sex.